Hall v. City of Columbus
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MARBLEY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is the result of two cases being consolidated. In Case No. 96-CV-068, Plaintiffs, Doug and Donna Hall brought claims of negligence and loss of consortium against Defendants, City of Columbus, the Water Division of the City of Columbus, and Kathleen Taylor, an employee of the Water Division of the City of Columbus. 1 In Case No. 96-CV-094, Plaintiff Doug Hall Inc., Doug Hall’s employer, brought the same claims against the same Defendants, and also asserted a right to compensation from Defendants under a Kentucky state…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Menefee v. Queen City MetroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Cleveland Municipal Court v. Cleveland City CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Prime Time Sales, LLC v. Global Fresh Produce, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020