Legal Opinion

Cowden v. Crippen

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1936No. 7,461PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

Viola Cowden, Loretta Cowden, Lorna Crawford and Ruth Cowden, heirs. at law of L. E. Cowden, deceased, obtained a judgment in the district court of Custer county against Clarence Crippen. The action was prosecuted under the so-called ‘ ‘ Guest Statute” of the state of Montana (Chap. 195, Laws of 1931), which reads as follows:

“Section 1. The owner or operator of a motor vehicle shall not be liable for any damages or injuries to any passenger or person riding in said motor vehicle as a guest or by invitation and not for hire, nor for any damages to such passenger’s or person’s parent or…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Morton v. MooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Autio v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  3. McNair v. BergerMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Allen v. Bear Creek Coal Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Mize v. Rocky Mountain Bell Telephone Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Kudrna v. Comet Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Batchoff v. CraneyMontana Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Koppang v. SevierMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Baatz v. NobleMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Boepple v. MohaltMontana Supreme Court · 1936

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API