Legal Opinion
Cheshire Commercial Corp. v. Messier
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 12, 1971No. File No. CV 7-695-13782PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDearington, J.
The plaintiff is the assignee of a negotiable promissory note made by the defendants and payable to the order of the assignor. The note *543is in default. After a trial, the court awarded judgment for the plaintiff in the amount found to he due. In their assignments of error, as briefed, the defendants claim that the court erred in concluding that the plaintiff was a holder in due course and further that the court erred in ruling that the defendants were precluded from offering evidence of an alleged defense relating to defective equipment.
No attack is made on the finding, which sets forth that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schaller v. Roadside Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Linahan v. LinahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Fairfield Credit Corp. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- State Ex Rel. Scala v. Airport CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Banks v. AdelmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United Overseas Bank v. Veneers, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
- Security Pacific National Bank v. ChessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Duxbury v. RobertsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Consolidated Capital Corp. v. DeSalvoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1990
- Robitaille v. Downey, No. Cv-89-41810s (Dec. 11, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991