Legal Opinion

Langer v. Superior Steel Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 1932No. Appeal 201PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.

This is an action of assumpsit to recover damages for breach of a contract. The court below sustained questions of law raised by defendant, and entered judgment in its favor.

The plaintiff alleges that he is entitled to recover certain monthly payments provided for in the following letter:

“August 31, 1927.
“Mr. Wm. F. Langer,
“Dear Sir:
“As you are retiring from active duty with this company, as superintendent of the annealing department, on August 31st, we hope that it will give you some pleasure to receive this official letter of commendation for your long and faithful…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. York Metal & Alloys Co. v. Cyclops Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Ricketts v. ScothornNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Presbyterian Board of Foreign Missions v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  4. Kirksey v. KirkseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
  5. Kirkpatrick v. MuirheadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1851

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Fried v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Harkins v. ZamichieliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Schofield v. Zion's Co-Op. Mercantile InstitutionUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Spooner v. Reserve Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. David v. Veitscher Magnesitwerke Actien GesellschaftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API