Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Coats v. Johnson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 21, 1979No. P-79-50PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRETT, Judge:

On January 29,1979, the respondent, Seventh Judicial District Judge, Sandra Johnson, declared 10 O.S.Supp.1978, §§ 1104.2 and 1112(b), unconstitutional on the grounds (1) that the statutes deny equal protection of the law; (2) that Section 1112(b) creates a constitutionally impermissible presumption that 16 and 17-year-olds accused of serious crimes should be treated as adults; (3) that the statutes impermissi-bly shift the burden of persuasion on the question of whether a 16 or 17-year-old accused of a serious crime should be treated as a juvenile or as an adult; and (4)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Eddings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. World Publishing Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. State Ex Rel. Coats v. RakestrawCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. J. M. R. v. MooreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. State Ex Rel. Burns v. SteelyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API