State Ex Rel. Coats v. Rakestraw
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSSEY, Judge:
Following the motions challenging the constitutionality of Laws 1979, c. 257, §§ 1, 2, and 3 — 10 O.S.Supp.1979, § 1101(a), § 1104.2, and § 1109(a) — filed by three de*258fendants between 16 and 18 years of age charged separately with Kidnapping, Rape and/or Robbery with Firearms in Oklahoma County District Court Cases CRF-79-4115, CRF-80-0075, and CRF-79-5101, the Honorable Arthur Lory Rakestraw held the certification procedure contained therein unconstitutional. This matter was set for oral argument on the State’s application filed in this Court to assume original…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Sherfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. BellUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
- Douma v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
- Trolinger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.