Legal Opinion

Adrian C. Eichman v. Fotomat Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 17, 1989No. 87-6532PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALARCON, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-Appellant, Adrian C. Eichman, appeals from two orders of the district court granting summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee, Fotomat Corporation. Eichman appeals from the order of the district court granting Fotomat’s motion for partial summary judgment based on res judicata and the statute of limitations. Eichman also appeals from the subsequent order of the district court which granted Fotomat’s motion for summary judgment based on the merits of the remaining state and federal claims. We affirm.

I

FACTS

Plaintiff-Appellant, Adrian C. Eichman, a Fotomat…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Austin v. McNamaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Global Eagle Entertainment, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  4. Anders E. Trell v. Marlee Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  5. Panavision International, L.P. v. ToeppenDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API