Legal Opinion
Diaz Cerda v. Cillessen & Sons, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided November 10, 2020No. 6:19-cv-01111Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS JOSE DIAZ CERDA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 19-1111-JWB CILLESSEN & SONS, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This case comes before the court on Defendant Cillessen & Sons, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 70) and Plaintiff Jose Diaz Cerda’s motion to strike (Doc. 80). The motions are fully briefed and ripe for decision. (Docs. 71, 79, 86, 87, 90.) Defendant’s motion (Doc. 70) is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART and Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 80) is DENIED for the reasons stated herein. I. Facts and Procedural History In…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Lifewise Master Funding v. TelebankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Thom v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.