Legal Opinion

The Penn Fuel

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 22, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

This motion is denied.

The libel, which forms the background of this proceeding, was filed on behalf of underwriters by the Payne Coal Company, Inc.— hereinafter referred to as the cool company— as owner of a cargo of coal, to recover $750 for damage claimed to have been suffered by the coal while on board the barge Penn Fuel.

The parties to the proceeding, which is really independent of the libel, are, on the one side, the coal company and, on the other, Louis H. Rowe, Esq., who has been a member in good standing of the bar of this court since June 3, 1902.

The motion is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Karlin v. CulkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. MarescaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920
  3. Bowling Green Savings Bank v. . ToddNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Matter of Bailey v. RutherfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. In re the Minnesota Phonograph Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. JK Welding Co. v. Gotham Marine CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  2. United States v. MathewsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API