Legal Opinion

United States v. Mathews

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 13, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

I grant the motion to the extent of dismissing the complaint as against Michael O’Keefe and Anna O’Keefe on the ground that there is not any cause of action stated in the complaint as against them.

I cannot give any broader relief than that, although the motion asks it, because no subpoena has been served on the other defendants, and, consequently, no suit has been brought against them and in respect of them no proceeding is pending in this court.

I. The motion in this ease is made for an order dismissing the complaint and vacating the temporary injunction herein on the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Denapolis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1925
  2. Engler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  3. Goldstein v. EhrlickNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
  4. In re ProbstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
  5. United States v. McCroryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  2. United States v. LyonsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API