Legal Opinion

Haugen v. Peterson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 13, 1987No. C8-85-2212PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

This case comes before us on appeal from the court of appeals which enforced restrictive covenants on land owned by appellant, preventing her from constructing a new home on a lot created by subdividing her original lot. The court of appeals reversed the District Court of Hennepin County, which had held the restrictive covenants void by reason of Minn.Stat. § 500.-20, subd. 2 (1980) (repealed 1982). 1 We reverse the court of appeals and reinstate the decision of the district court.

In 1947, Muriel Y. Peterson and her husband purchased a lot in an area which became the Indian…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ewell v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Ridgewood Development Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Kiges v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Hawkinson v. County of ItascaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Ford v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Federated Retail Holdings, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Andrews v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  3. State v. OrnelasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. State v. OrnelasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API