Legal Opinion

Federated Retail Holdings, Inc. v. County of Ramsey

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 19, 2012No. A11-2093PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIETZEN, Justice.

The issue presented in this case is whether the tax court has subject-matter jurisdiction to consider the value of the leasehold interest in real property adjacent to the tax parcel on appeal. The Ramsey County Assessor determined that the fair market value of the tax parcel, which is improved by a Macy’s department store operated by respondent Federated Retail Holdings, Inc., was $17,000,000 for the assessment dates of January 2, 2006, and January 2, 2007. The assessor included the value of a leasehold interest held by Federated in the parcel adjacent to the tax…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. City of Bowie v. MIE, Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Kettle River Railroad v. Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. In Re Petition of S. R. A., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. Vawter v. CraftsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. Schleiff v. County of FreebornSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. VangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  2. Schober v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. 444 Lafayette, LLC v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. County of Aitkin, relators v. Blandin Paper CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  5. Vt Land Trust v. KurtVermont Superior Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API