Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Bradford

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1882No. Case No. 1391PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Victoria. Tried below before the Hon. H. Clay Pleasants.

1Opinion of the Court

Gould, Chief Justice.—

This is an action of trespass. to try title to lot No. 3, block 113, in the town of Victoria, in which the plaintiff Bradford claims title under two sales, by virtue of executions issued on a judgment by default, rendered in the district court of Victoria *633county February 23, 1866, in favor of “ Longstreet, Bradford & Co.” and against “Rogers & Oliver.” On a former appeal, the case was by agreement of parties referred to the commissioners of appeal, and, in accordance with their opinion, the judgment was reversed because the court below had excluded the judgment by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Guerrant v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1826
  2. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Howe v. BlandenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
  4. Gault v. WoodbridgeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio · 1847
  5. O'Conner v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sun Mutual Insurance v. Geo. Seeligson & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Lowell v. Ball, Hutchings & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Sun Mutual Insurance v. George Seeligson & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API