Fiskewold v. HM Smyth Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
*165OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Upon learning that he would be laid off in two days, relator William Fiskewold immediately quit his temporary job with respondent employer. A Commissioner’s representative with the Department of Jobs and Training concluded Fiskewold was disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits because he had “voluntarily quit his job without good cause attributable to his employer.” We affirm the disqualification for the two-day period of time prior to Fiskewold’s effective layoff date, but reverse the total disqualification for the period of time subsequent to the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Smith v. Employers' Overload Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Lisa Marz v. Department of Employment ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Bergseth v. Zinsmaster Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Labor & Industry Department v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Ferguson v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. PolinskyNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Stacy v. Batavia Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Stacy v. Batavia Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Krueger v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Baron v. Lens Crafters, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.