Legal Opinion

Tygesen v. MAGNA WATER CO.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1950No. 7550PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADE, Justice.

*278This is an original proceeding in this court brought by the plaintiff to obtain a writ prohibiting the defendants from issuing and selling general obligation bonds of the District in the amount of $75,000 and issuing revenue bonds in the amount of $175,000. The Attorney General of the State of Utah has been made a third party defendant because one of the purposes of plaintiff’s action is to attack the constitutionality of Chapter 24, Laws of Utah 1949, by the authority of which statute The Magna Water Co., an Improvement District, was established.

Chapter 24, Laws of Utah 1949,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. State v. MasonUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Lehi City v. Meiling, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Patterick v. Carbon Water Conservancy Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Nowers v. OakdenUtah Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of West Jordan v. Utah State Retirement BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State Water Pollution Control Board v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Barlow v. Clearfield City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Freeman v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Murray City v. Board of Education of Murray City School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API