Legal Opinion
FROMM & SICHEL, INC. v. Ray's Brookfield, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 29, 1966PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
This court has previously upheld the constitutionality of portions of sec. 133.25, Stats., the “Fair Trade Act.” Ed. Schuster & Co. v. Steffes (1941), 237 Wis. 41, 295 N. W. 737; Weco Products Co. v. Reed Drug Co. (1937), 225 Wis. 474, 274 N. W. 426; Bulova Watch Co. v. Anderson (1955), 270 Wis. 21, 70 N. W. (2d) 243. At oral argument the defendants stated that they did not challenge the constitutionality of the pertinent statutes; consequently, that question is not before this court. The question is merely whether the schedule circulated by the distributor sufficiently apprised the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Weco Products Co. v. Reed Drug Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Maitland v. Twin City Aviation Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
- Bulova Watch Co. v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Bartell Broadcasters, Inc. v. Milwaukee Broadcasting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Kuntz v. Werner Flying Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pure Milk Products Cooperative v. National Farmers OrganizationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Werner v. A. L. Grootemaat & Sons, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Browne v. Milwaukee Board of School DirectorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Mercury Record Productions, Inc. v. Economic Consultants, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Mercury Records Productions, Inc. v. Economic Consultants, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.