Legal Opinion

Bulova Watch Co. v. Anderson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1955PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The sole reason which was assigned by the learned trial judge for his sustaining of the demurrer was his conclusion that the plaintiff foreign corporation lacked capacity to sue under sec. 180.847, Stats. Sub. (1) of such statute provides as follows:

“No foreign corporation transacting business or acquiring, holding, or disposing of property in this state without a certificate of authority, if a certificate of authority is required under this chapter, shall be permitted to maintain or defend a civil action or special proceeding in any court of this state, until such corporation shall have…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weco Products Co. v. Reed Drug Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  2. McGraw Electric Co. v. Lewis & Smith Drug Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Procter & Gamble Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Charles A. Stickney Co. v. LynchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Standard Sewing Equipment Corp. v. Motor Specialty, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bulova Watch Co. v. Zale Jewelry Co. of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Home Utilities Co. v. Revere Copper & Brass, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  3. Scovill Manufacturing Co. v. Skaggs Pay Less Drug StoresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Dr. G. H. Tichenor Antiseptic Co. v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super MarketsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  5. General Electric Co. v. Thrifty Sales, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API