Legal Opinion

In Re Williams

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 9, 2007No. BAP 06-8027PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREGG, Bankruptcy Judge.

William P. Bringman (“Appellant”), counsel for the chapter 7 debtors, appeals the bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of his fee application, and reducing his requested attorney’s fees to the presumptive, or “no look,” fee for chapter 7 cases filed in the Northern District of Ohio prior to October 17, 2005. 1 For the reasons that follow, the bankruptcy court’s order is REVERSED and REMANDED.

I.ISSUE ON APPEAL

Whether the bankruptcy court abused its discretion by failing to conduct a lodestar analysis when reviewing the Appellant’s fee…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  4. Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. In the Matter of Bobby Cahill, Janice Cahill, Debtors. Walker & Patterson, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re BrentUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  2. In re UlrichUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  3. In Re WilliamsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
  4. In Re WaldoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2009
  5. In Re McLean Wine Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API