Legal Opinion

In Re Williams

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 4, 2007No. 13-32979PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART APPLICATION FOR POST-CONFIRMATION FEES

PHILLIP J. SHEFFERLY, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. Introduction

This opinion addresses an application for fees by the Debtor’s counsel in a Chapter 13 case, which has since converted to Chapter 7. The fees at issue were all incurred post-confirmation. The Chapter 13 Trustee and the Debtor have objected to the fees. Their objections illuminate a range of issues that arise in Chapter 13 cases when a thinly funded plan is confirmed, the debtor later experiences a setback, and the debtor’s attorney fees to save the case…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Pettibone Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
  2. In Re SaturleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1991
  3. In Re ArgentoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
  4. In Re WilliamsBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. In Re New Boston Coke Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Boyd v. EngmanDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
  2. In Re McLean Wine Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
  3. In re HirschUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2016
  4. In re CrippsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2016
  5. In re Ellipso, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Columbia · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API