Legal Opinion
Hill v. Rivers
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 21, 1946No. 15380PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWyatt, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) In the view we take of this case, it is unnecessary to determine whether the judge of the superior court was correct in the reason given for his judgment of reversal. If the judgment is right, it should be sustained, though the reasons given for the judgment may be erroneous. Coker v. Atlanta, 186 Ga. 473 (198 S. E. 74), and cit.
This is 'a controversy between parents over the custody of their minor son. The maternal grandmother, who was not a party to the controversy, but who appeared and testified at the trial, was awarded the custody. By undisputed…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Miller v. WallaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Girtman v. GirtmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Williams v. CrosbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Coker v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Chapin v. CummingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Argonaut Insurance v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Perkins v. CoursonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Rawdin v. ConnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- United States Casualty Co. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Peeples v. NewmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.