Legal Opinion

Lamb-Campbell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 3, 1913No. 2819PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of forgery.

The record contains neither a statement of facts, nor any bills of exception, but a motion in arrest of judgment was filed vigorously attacking the indictment, and an able brief has been filed, presenting this ground alone for review. Omitting the formal parts the indictment reads: That appellant "without lawful authority and with intent +o

injure and defraud, did wilfully and fraudulently make a false instrument in writing purporting to be the act of another, to-wit: the act of H. W. St. John, Treasurer of the Aetna Life…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reeseman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  3. Usher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chimene v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Blake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Townser v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API