Townser v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of forgery and assessed the lowest punishment.
The indictment, after the preliminary necessary allegations alleged: That' appellant on or about April 29, 1915, in said county, “did then and there, without lawful authority, and with intent to injure and defraud, wilfully and fraudulently make a certain false instrument in writing, purporting to be the act of another, towit, purporting to be the act of Eliza Matthews, which said false instrument is to the tenor as follows:
“ ‘Mr. Fout let this girl have 4 yards of Pink Sateen and 2-£ yard of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reeseman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Ex Parte BarteeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Lucas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Spicer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McLaren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Ex Parte McLoudCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- McLaren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
- McLaren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917