Legal Opinion

Blake v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 29, 1941No. 21695PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a forgery case; the punishment, two years in the State penitentiary.

Appellant attacks the sufficiency of the count in the indictment upon which the conviction is predicated as being vague, indefinite and ambiguous. With this contention we are not in accord. The instrument set forth therein was the subject of forgery. It was an ordinary commercial instrument, purporting to be a receipt for money paid. Chimene v. State, 106 S. W. (2d) 692, 133 Tex. Cr. R. 43; Martin v. State, 209. S. W. 668, 85 Tex. Cr. R. 89; Lamb-Campbell v. State, 162 S. W. 879, 72 Tex. Cr. R. 628.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Chimene v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Lamb-Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shipp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. Shipp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  3. Shipp, Allen RayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  4. Shipp, Allen RayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API