Legal Opinion

Ensey v. Hines

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1883PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Johnson District Court. At the November Term, 1882, plaintiff Hines recovered a judgment for $250 against Ensey, as executor, etc., who brings it here for reversal. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

The facts in this case are .substantially these: Mazeppa E. Hines presented a claim against the estate of Matthew Ensey, deceased, for washing, ironing, making and mending clothes for said Matthew Ensey, and for nursing, waiting upon and taking care of him from September 13, 1877, until September 19, 1881, amounting to $416. After a hearing upon the claim in the probate court, an appeal was taken to the district court. That court gave her judgment for $250, from which judgment the executor of the decedent’s will brings the case to'this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Guenther v. Birkicht's AdministratorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  2. Ayres v. HullSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  3. Greenwell v. GreenwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Estate of KesslerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Johnson v. LanderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Logston v. NeedhamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Webster v. CampSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. In re Erickson v. EricksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API