Legal Opinion

United States v. John Doe

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 23, 2005No. 04-4136PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROSENN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal raises several serious questions concerning the time-respected role of privileged communication between client and attorney and the crime-fraud exception. For almost four years now, the Government has had an active grand jury investigating certain activities of a federal law enforcement officer (hereinafter referred to as “Target”). The Government submitted details of the investigation to the District Court under seal through an ex parte affidavit of Peter R. Zeidenberg, a trial attorney of the Criminal Division of the Public Integrity…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Haines v. Liggett Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of Fmc Corporation, Douglas E. Kliever and Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In Re Teleglobe Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. Wachtel v. Health Net, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  3. In Re: GRAND JURY INVESTIGATIONCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  4. In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  5. In Re Grand Jury SubpoenaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API