Legal Opinion

H. R. Woolridge Co. v. Smith

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clearfield County

Decided April 12, 1978No. 77-1166-CDPublished

1Opinion of the Court

REILLY, P.J.,

The above complaint in assumpsit was heard by the court sitting without a jury. Plaintiff, H. R. Woolridge Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, is doing business as an independent insurance agency, while defendant, Richard J. Smith, is the owner and operator of a *231trucking concern. Plaintiff seeks to recover from defendant funds paid to two insurance companies on behalf of said defendant who contends that said expenditures were not authorized. This court concludes that plaintiff was authorized to act for and on behalf of defendant and is, therefore, entitled to full recovery.

To…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garland A. Holbrook and Truck Acceptance Corporation v. Institutional Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
  2. Jones v. Dubuque Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Hendricks v. Continental InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Stewart v. Mullineaux (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Norwich Union Fire Ins. Society, Ltd. v. Paramount Famous Lasky Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API