Legal Opinion

Pickett v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 1954No. 4813PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFess, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a finding and judgment of the Common Pleas Court that plaintiff is not entitled to participate in the workmen’s compensation fund.

The rehearing record discloses that the Sun Oil Company of Toledo, Ohio, let a contract to the Catalytic Construction Company, general contractors, to build additional plants on its premises located at East Toledo, near Woodville Road. The general contractor in turn sublet some of the work to subcontractors, including the G. & L. Firebrick Contractors, Inc., by whom claimant was employed.

Adjacent to the enclosed area…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Goodyear Aircraft Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Malone v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Sebek v. Cleveland Graphite Bronze Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Industrial Commission v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 1933

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rohrs v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. Dependable Messenger, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  3. Harvey v. MayfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API