Stephens v. Haugwitz
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
Properly construed, the order of the judge in passing on the demurrer of Mrs. Haugwitz to the petition as amended, as appears in the following statement of facts, is an interlocutory order, and is not a final judgment in the case; and therefore, under the Civil Code (1910), § 6138, the bill of exceptions must be dismissed as prematurely brought. See, in this connection, Deadwyler v. Bank, 110 Ga. 511 (35 S. E. 779); Zorn v. Lamar, 71 Ga. 80 (2); 1 Cum. Supp. Enc. Dig. Ga. R. 574. The plaintiff in error is given permission to file, as exceptions pendente lite, his exceptions to the order…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Zorn v. LamarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Deadwyler v. Bank of UniversitySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. Motor Contract Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Smith v. Atlanta Enterprises Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Ferguson v. Randolph CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1954