Milan Express, Inc. v. Averitt Express, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HULL, Circuit Judge:
Averitt Express, Inc. (“Averitt”) and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (“USFG”) appeal the district court’s denial of their renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law, and the district court’s decision to award Milan Express, Inc. (“Milan”) the $50,000 amount of the injunction bond and to reinstate a jury verdict for additional damages of $1,870,521.21. After review and oral argument, we affirm in part, and reverse and remand in part.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
A. ICC’s Initial Order
Since the early 1990’s, Averitt and Milan, two trucking companies, have…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morro v. City of BirminghamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Coyne-Delany Co., Inc. v. Capital Development Board of the State of Illinois, Defendant-Cross-Plaintiff-Appellant v. Hanover Insurance Company, Cross-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Ex Parte Waterjet Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Milan Express, Inc. v. Averitt Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Alabama ex rel. Siegelman v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Global NAPs, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Pierce Manufacturing, Inc. v. E-One, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2022