Legal Opinion
Milan Express, Inc. v. Averitt Express, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 7, 2000No. 98-7024PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARKETT, Circuit Judge:
Milan Express, Inc. (“Milan”) appeals the district court’s order vacating in part for lack of jurisdiction the jury’s award of damages. The district court vacated the portion of the verdict awarding damages in excess of the amount of a Rule 56(c) bond posted to secure an injunction that had been wrongfully obtained by Averitt Express, Inc. (“Averitt”). 1 The court ruled that its jurisdiction was limited only to Milan’s claim for the specific amount of the bond and entered a final judgment upholding the jury’s verdict for this amount. Av-eritt and U.S. Fidelity and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rebecca Otwell Baggett, Teressa Latrelle Otwell, Frances Otwell Bagby v. First National Bank of GainesvilleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Engelhardt v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Buddy Systems, Inc., a California Corporation v. Exer-Genie, Inc., a Corporation, and E. E. HolkesvickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Lucero v. TroschCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- McMILLIAN v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. Robert PetrieCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Joel CartwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Justice Cometh, Ltd. v. Harry B. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Arturo Rubinstein v. Yoram YehubaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
- Doe v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.