United States v. Jose Zamora-Andrade
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
Jose Efrain Zamora-Andrade pleaded guilty to illegal reentry. He argues for the first time on appeal that his guilty plea was unknowing and involuntary because the magistrate judge failed to comply with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 in various respects, including failing to determine whether his guilty plea was not the result of force, threats, or promises; failing to admonish him of any mandatory minimum penalty; and failing to advise him that he would be required to provide a DNA sample.
Our review is for plain error. See United States v. Vonn, 535 U.S. 55, 59, 122 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Vasquez-BernalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Wilbert v. Ladue, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017