Legal Opinion

Roeder v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 27, 1898No. 1410PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Tarrant. Tried below before Hon. Irby Dunklin. Appeal from a conviction for theft of property over the value of $50; penalty, two years imprisonment in the penitentiary. The opinion states the ease.

1Opinion of the Court

HENDEBSOH, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of theft of certain articles of merchandise over the value of $50, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years.

The only question presented in the record for our consideration is whether the allegation in the indictment of ownership of the goods in H. Huffman is supported by the evidence. We summarize from the testimony on this point as follows: The goods taken were in a certain storehouse of one H. Huffman,-situated in the city of Fort Worth. Otto Boeder, appellant, was in the employ of said Huffman, and had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Livingston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. TilleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Bryan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Duncan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
  4. Bismark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
  5. Hall v. Great National LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API