Legal Opinion
CONTINENTAL TRANSFERT TECHNIQUE LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF NIGERIA Et Al., Defendants
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 28, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2008-2026PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
G. MICHAEL HARVEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On March 3, 2015, this case was referred to the undersigned for purposes of management of discovery and resolution of any discovery-related disputes. Currently ripe for resolution is the defendants’ motion to strike 1 the plaintiffs January 14, 2014, notice of deposition issued pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6). 2 For the reasons stated below, the defendants’ motion will be denied.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Procedural History
On May 25, 1999, Continental Transferí Technique Limited, a Nigerian corporation with its principal place of business in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling ConsultantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- NML Capital, Ltd. v. Republic of ArgentinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Thai Lao Lignite (Thailand) Co. v. Government of the Lao People's Democratic RepublicDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Avirgan v. HullDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Amduso v. Republic of SudanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Amduso v. Republic of SudanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Scutellaro v. Capitol Supply, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017