Legal Opinion
Scutellaro v. Capitol Supply, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 19, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2010-1094Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex. rel. Louis Scutellaro, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 10-1094 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell CAPITOL SUPPLY, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The relator, Louis Scutellaro, brings this lawsuit against the defendant, Capitol Supply, Inc., pursuant to the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(1), alleging that the defendant falsely certified that the products it sold to federal agencies were manufactured in compliance with the Trade Agreements Act (“TAA”),
19 U.S.C. §§…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.