Legal Opinion
Fouché & Fouché v. Morris
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 31, 1900PublishedCited by 16 opinions
• Certiorari. Before Judge Henry. Floyd superior court. March term, 1900.
1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.
Morris caused a summons of gárnishment to be issued •directed to Fouché & Fouché, requiring them to appear at a justice’s court and answer what they were indebted to George Duncan. The garnishees appeared and answered that they owed Duncan nothing. This answer was traversed by Morris. Upon the trial ■of the traverse in the justice’s court the following state of facts was disclosed: About thirty days prior to December, 1899, Fouché & Fouché, representing George Duncan, and I. E. Shumate, representing the Southern Railway Company, entered into a “ compromise .■settlement,” for the sum of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Roberts v. KeelerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Long v. ScanlanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Gamble v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- First National Bank v. MassengillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
3Cited by16 opinions
- Redman v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Perry v. Brunswick & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Fowler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Yellow Cab Co. v. General Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Fowler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.