Arant v. Kressler
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice:
This is a medical malpractice case. Appellant contends the trial judge erred in refusing to allow her to amend her pleadings under Rule 15(b), SCRCP, on the ground the amended claim was time-barred. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant brought this action against respondents Drs. Kressler and Parr, partners in a gynecology/obstetrics practice, for infertility allegedly resulting from a negligently performed surgical procedure known as a dilation and curettage (D & C), a scraping of the uterine cavity. The facts adduced at trial were as follows.
Appellant gave birth on December 30,1989,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brown v. FingerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- Kreutner v. DavidSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Johnston v. BowenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Strong v. University of South Carolina School of MedicineSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Scott v. McCainSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Moriarty v. Garden Sanctuary Church of GodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Herron v. AnigboIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Dunbar v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- McMaster v. DewittCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
- McAlhany v. CarterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.