Legal Opinion

Arant v. Kressler

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 11, 1997No. 24671PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice:

This is a medical malpractice case. Appellant contends the trial judge erred in refusing to allow her to amend her pleadings under Rule 15(b), SCRCP, on the ground the amended claim was time-barred. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant brought this action against respondents Drs. Kressler and Parr, partners in a gynecology/obstetrics practice, for infertility allegedly resulting from a negligently performed surgical procedure known as a dilation and curettage (D & C), a scraping of the uterine cavity. The facts adduced at trial were as follows.

Appellant gave birth on December 30,1989,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. FingerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  2. Kreutner v. DavidSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Johnston v. BowenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Strong v. University of South Carolina School of MedicineSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Scott v. McCainSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Moriarty v. Garden Sanctuary Church of GodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Herron v. AnigboIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Dunbar v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  4. McMaster v. DewittCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  5. McAlhany v. CarterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API