Legal Opinion

Fountaine's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 27, 1923PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenney, J.

In this proceeding under the workmen’s compensation act, Frank Fountaine, an employee of Farr Alpaca Company, alleges that on October 21, 1921, he received personal injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. His claim was heard by a single member of the Industrial Accident Board who, after hearing the evidence, twice found that the injury did not result from the *514employment, there having been a second hearing because of recommittal. Thereafter a claim for review (filed under G. L. c. 152, § 10), was heard by a board designated under G. L. c. 24, § 3, which board had before it…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Swan v. Justices of Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Pigeon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Donovan's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Johnson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  5. Sanderson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mayor v. Judge of First District CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Rodriguez v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Vinal v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  5. Morris v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API