Lamb v. Littman.

Erom a careful review of the evidence, we find that it establishes a prima facie case, and his Llonor erred in sustaining the motion to dismiss, as in case of nonsuit, and in not submitting tbe issues to the jury. The evidence shows that defendant, in running his mill through agents, had one general superintendent who hired and discharged hands, and also had spinning-room superintendents, bosses or overseers, who controlled and directed the hands in the performance of their work, and also sometimes hired and, in case of disobedience, of which they were the judges, discharged the hands under…