Furness, Withy & Co. v. Randall
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. (Bowd, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtStockbridge, J.
The plaintiffs in this case were and are grain commission merchants in the City of Baltimore. The defendant is a corporation owning and operating a “Line” of steamers of irregular sailing between Baltimore and Leith, Scotland, the vessels being what are frequently called “Tramp” steamers, and actually performing their voyages only when there was a ship load of freight to be- carried. On the 26th September, 1911, an agreement was entered into in the following language :
“Dkesee, Rauschenbeeg & Co. Agents .Furness Lino. Freight Contract.
Contract Ho. 66. Baltimore, Sept. 26, 1911.
Engaged, from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thomas Roberts & Co. v. BonaparteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
- The TornadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- A. D. Birely & Sons v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
- Atwell v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
- Meyer v. FrenkilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Roland Ex Rel. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Lloyd E. Mitchell, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Gallagher's Estate v. BattleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Hercules Powder Co. v. Harry T. Campbell Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
- Wischhusen v. Spirits Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- National School Studios, Inc. v. MealeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.