Legal Opinion

Investment Service Co. v. North Pacific Lumber Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1972PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The plaintiff, as assignee of a bank, is attempting to recover the invoice price for lumber sold to defendant. The bank contends it is entitled to recover because Browne, a lumber producer, assigned the proceeds of the invoice to it and transferred a security interest in the lumber to it. The defendant, a lumber wholesaler, contends it does not owe the entire invoice for the reason that it has a setoff because of defective lumber which Browne previously sold defendant.

Prior to all the sales involved here, the bank did perfect its security interest in Browne’s lumber inventory.

Browne shipped a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rogue River Management Co. v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Jefferson Union Co. v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Handy and Harman, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Seattle-First National Bank v. Oregon Pacific Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. K-Mart Corp. v. First Pennsylvania Bank, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1980
  4. Security Pacific Bank, N.A. v. Haines Terminal & Highway Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API