Legal Opinion
United States v. Handy and Harman, a New York Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 28, 1984No. 83-5697PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge.
Handy & Harman appeals from a judgment for the United States for the value of certain metal that Handy & Harman had purchased and in which the Small Business Administration had a security interest perfected in one state but not in the state where collection was attempted.
In 1978, Coronado Trading Co., a New Mexico-based manufacturer of jewelry, borrowed $200,000 from Albuquerque National Bank. The loan was guaranteed by the Small Business Administration. To secure the loan, Coronado gave the bank a security interest in its inventory and accounts receivable. The bank…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Citizens National Bank v. Mid-States Development Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- The First National Bank and Trust Company of Oklahoma City, Plaintiff v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Western Decor & Furnishings Industries, Inc. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- ASSOC. DIS. CORP. v. Fidelity Un. Trust Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Hauger v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Central Washington Bank v. Mendelson-Zeller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Permian Petroleum Co. v. Petroleos MexicanosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- In Re Halmar Distributors, Inc., Debtors. General Electric Company v. Halmar Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Producers Cotton Oil Co. v. Amstar Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Insley Manufacturing Corp. v. Draper Bank & TrustUtah Supreme Court · 1986
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.