Legal Opinion

State Of North Dakota v. Federal Power Commission

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 6, 1957No. 15669PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

247 F.2d 173

20 P.U.R.3d 460

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA and Public Service Commission of North

Dakota, Petitioners,

v.

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Amerada Petroleum Corporation,

Signal Oil and Gas Company and Montana-Dakota

Utilities Company, Respondents.

No. 15669.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Aug. 6, 1957.

Charles L. Murphy, Bismarck, N.D. (Francis Murphy, Fargo, N.D., was with him on the brief), for petitioners.

Robert L. Russell, Atty., F.P.C., Washington, D.C. (Willard W. Gatchell, Gen. Counsel, Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and William L. Ellis, Atty., F.P.C., Washington,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. United States v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Michigan Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, Signal Oil and Gas Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  2. Younger v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Younger v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API