Younger v. Jensen
California Supreme Court
1DissentManuel, J.
I dissent. It is my view that a sound application of the principles of res judicata, supported by significant considerations of comity between courts of concurrent jurisdiction, precludes the Attorney General from maintaining that the investigation he here seeks to pursue—given the objects which he presently seeks to further through it—is not preempted by federal law. I would affirm the orders appealed from.
I
As the majority opinion indicates, in January 1976, the Attorney General, purporting to act under the provisions of section 11180 et seq. of the Government Code, delegated authority to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wooley v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.