Legal Opinion
Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, Signal Oil and Gas Company v. Federal Power Commission
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 15, 1964No. 17445, 17492PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEHAFFY, Circuit Judge.
Petitioners, Amerada Petroleum Corporation and Signal Oil and Gas Company, have perfected this appeal from an unfavorable decision and order of the Federal Power Commission (30 FPC 200) holding that its jurisdiction and attendant regulation extended over certain of Petitioners’ contracts for the sale of natural gas to the Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. (MDU) under the provisions of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 717-717w, which embraces generally the transportation or sale in interstate commerce of natural gas for resale. 1
The present litigation represents…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Ederal Power Commission v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Younger v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Tampa Phosphate Railroad Company v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Federal Power Commission v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California v. Lo-Vaca Gathering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California v. Lo-Vaca Gathering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.