Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company and Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 16, 1988No. 85-2511PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company and Hartford Fire Insurance Company (Hartford) brought this declaratory judgment action to ascertain the applicability of two comprehensive general liability policies Hartford had issued to Campbell Glass & Mirror Company (Campbell). The district court determined that the policies provided complete coverage to Campbell. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings. 1
I
The stipulated facts submitted by the parties establish that Campbell, working as a sub-contractor, furnished and installed a reflective,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hauenstein v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- American Home Assurance Co. v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Co., American Home Assurance Co. v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Wyoming Sawmills, Inc. v. Transportation InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Indiana Insurance v. DeZuttiIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. Concrete Units, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Dodson v. St. Paul Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Thommes v. Milwaukee Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Meléndez Piñero v. Levitt & Sons of Puerto Rico, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1991
- Monticello Insurance v. Wil-Freds Construction, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. East Central Oklahoma Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.