Legal Opinion

City of Racine v. Woiteshek

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1947PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRector, J.

The appeal is based upon asserted error in the exclusion of Dr. Cook’s evidence. The applicable statute reads:

“325.21 Communications to doctors. No physician or surgeon shall be permitted to disclose any information he may have acquired in attending any patient in a professional character, necessary to enable him professionally to serve such patient, except only (1) in trials for homicide when the disclosure relates directly to the fact or immediate circumstances of the homicide, (2) in all lunacy inquiries, (3) in actions, civil or criminal, against the physician for malpractice, (4) with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Keefe v. SchmiegeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  2. In re Will of BruendlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. State Ex Rel. McStroul v. LucasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. DeadmondSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Rusecki v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Schwartz v. SchneurigerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. City of Racine v. PovkovichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State Ex Rel. Pflaum v. State Psychology Examining BoardCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API