Legal Opinion
Rusecki v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 9, 1972No. 26PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
Two evidentiary questions are raised on this review:
1. Did the trial court err in not excluding Krass’s testimony concerning the defendant’s runaways, such information being communicated to him from the boy’s parents ?
2. Did the trial court err in not excluding the medical report and Krass’s testimony concerning that report pursuant to sec. 885.21, Stats. ?
A. Hearsay testimony.
It is the contention of defendant that the trial court’s delinquency finding, based upon sec. 48.12 (3), Stats.,2 was erroneous because it was grounded upon inadmissible hearsay testimony. It is undisputed that the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. HebardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- In Re Appeal of DattiloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. F. R. W.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. Denis L.R.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- In RE GGD v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Interest of Frw (A Minor)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Pflaum v. State Psychology Examining BoardCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.