Legal Opinion

(HC) Jansen v. Smith

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 20, 2025No. 2:23-cv-02018Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MICHAEL EDWARD JANSEN, No. 2:23-cv-02018-EFB (HC) 11 Petitioner, 12 v. ORDER 13 STEVE SMITH, Warden1 14 Respondent. 15 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 17 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss the petition on the 18 ground that it is untimely. ECF No. 11. Petitioner has opposed the motion, arguing that his 19 petition is timely. ECF No. 14. For the following reasons, respondent’s motion to dismiss is 20 GRANTED.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Ylst v. NunnemakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Donald Ray Patterson v. Terry L. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API