Legal Opinion
Garland v. Mayhall
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided July 29, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrownover, J.
This was an action for damages for personal injuries and damage to automobile as the result of an automobile collision on the public highway near Memphis.
The defendants pleaded not guilty. The case was tried by the judge and a jury, and resulted in a verdict of $5,200, $5,000 for personal injuries and $200 for damage to the automobile, for the plaintiff and against the defendants.
Motion for a new trial having been overruled, defendants appealed in error to this court and have assigned errors, which are, in substance, as follows:(1) There is no evidence to support the verdict.(2) The court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Power Packing Co. v. BorumCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
- Chattanooga Rapid Transit Co. v. WaltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
- Tennessee Central Railroad v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
- Middle Tennessee R. v. McMillanTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Chattanooga Station Co. v. HarperTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McKinnon v. MichaudCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
- Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
- Shook & Fletcher Supply Company v. City of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1960
- Walters v. StatonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
- Central Produce Co. v. General Cab Co. of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.