Legal Opinion

Gibbs v. Haynes Invs., LLC

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided March 22, 2019No. Civil Action No. 3:18cv48PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

As to Plain Green, Plaintiffs allege that the Haynes Defendants, in conjunction with other actors and through a web of entities, actually "funded and partially operated" the so-called "rent-a-tribe" scheme at the heart of this case. (Compl. ¶ 2.) Specifically, the Haynes Defendants and *909several non-tribal actors entered into a term sheet in support of the unlawful tribal lending operation.9 (See Compl. Ex. 1 "March 2011 Term Sheet" 1, ECF No. 1-1.) Per the March 2011 Term Sheet, a designated non-tribal entity10 provided "the infrastructure to run the lending operations." (Compl. ¶ 34 (citing…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. George Hengle v. Sherry TreppaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  2. Darlene Gibbs v. Sequoia Capital OperationsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  3. AUDIO POD IP, LLC v. AMAZON.COM, INC., et al.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2026
  4. Anderson v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2024
  5. Audio Pod IP, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API