Gibbs v. Haynes Invs., LLC
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
As to Plain Green, Plaintiffs allege that the Haynes Defendants, in conjunction with other actors and through a web of entities, actually "funded and partially operated" the so-called "rent-a-tribe" scheme at the heart of this case. (Compl. ¶ 2.) Specifically, the Haynes Defendants and *909several non-tribal actors entered into a term sheet in support of the unlawful tribal lending operation.9 (See Compl. Ex. 1 "March 2011 Term Sheet" 1, ECF No. 1-1.) Per the March 2011 Term Sheet, a designated non-tribal entity10 provided "the infrastructure to run the lending operations." (Compl. ¶ 34 (citing…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- George Hengle v. Sherry TreppaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- Darlene Gibbs v. Sequoia Capital OperationsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- AUDIO POD IP, LLC v. AMAZON.COM, INC., et al.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2026
- Anderson v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2024
- Audio Pod IP, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.